I've always wondered about this, England are better at Cricket, Rugby and Soccer (all world wide sports) for sure, but America is better at American Football, Basketball, Hockey, Baseball and Athletics (Only one of which could really be called a world wide sport). But what is more important? Being good at a sport that is played world wide, or being good at lots of sports?

__________________________
Heroes Come And Go,
But Legends Live Forever,
Live Fast, Play Hard,
Be The Legend

The US can kick Englands ass in swimming thats a worldwide sport, and one way to check is to look at the olympics the US got way more medals last time then UK but lets wait and see for this time

__________________________
Nothing is impossible.

well hockey is a world wide sport and so is basketball (both in olympics)

__________________________
AiDG


"yeah but im a wise dumb ass"
-Shadow Stalker

who ever said 3rd times a charm has never met me :P

true but i would have to say the world wide sports are more important not just the sports u play in one specific country because it does not give a good comparison

__________________________
It's allways been my fault

Mabye one day we'll beat America at the Olypics9hopefully in athens)

neither Cricket nor Rugby are world wide sports

basquetball and baseball are world wide sports so soccer and athletics.

__________________________
Pride Of The machines

i think u will find cricket is a worldwide sport just not many people pay attention to it

__________________________
It's allways been my fault

And there is a rugby WORLD cup.
i'd like to see and american football world cup(america wins every time)

Personaly I don't like american footbal my description:

22 idiots running around on a field trying to kill each other

__________________________
Nothing is impossible.

we are united gea we are winner ,uk losers

football is awesome